Specialized Torch 1.0 Shoes Review

With the Torch 1.0 at less than €100, Specialized shines in an area where the American brand is not necessarily expected: entry-level cycling shoes. Boa closure, comfort, and aesthetics reminiscent of the most upscale models are the main characteristics of these surprising shoes, both on paper and on the road.

By Guillaume Judas – Photos: @3bikes.fr

Specialized, a brand specializing in high-end bikes and accessories (clothing or components), directly targets products found in large specialized stores such as Decathlon with the Torch 1.0. Or even a few rare entry-level models offered by major cycling shoe brands. But here, the new Torch 1.0 benefits from features unprecedented for the category, without straying from the target clientele by emphasizing comfort above all.

Like many avid cyclists – and thus different from occasional riders who are normally interested in this type of product – we usually swear by hyper-rigid shoes with very firm support. We only expect comfort by limiting friction or blood circulation cuts, and refuse the slightest sensation of heel float, or lack of sole stiffness.

However, we came into contact with the Torch 1.0 in a somewhat particular context: a period of rehabilitation after a foot fracture. We put them on almost immediately after resuming cycling, with uncertain foot placement and no recent reference. And above all, with a rather modest physical condition that initially prevented any overly vigorous out-of-the-saddle accelerations. Curiously, although our fitness returned quite quickly (after about fifteen rides), we delayed as much as possible the moment we switched back to stiffer and theoretically more efficient shoes. One reason for this: comfort! A sensation never experienced to this extent until the Torch 1.0.

Features inherited from the high-end

The Torch 1.0 shoes benefit from certain features found on widely proven, and much more expensive, models in the Specialized range. This starts with an outsole incorporating the Body Geometry concept with a 1.5° Varus wedge, meaning a slight outward angle of the sole to optimize alignment between the hip, knee, and foot.

Next, there’s a Boa L6 Snap closure, unprecedented at this price point, for very precise adjustment in either direction, and a release of the entire closure by pulling on the dial. At the front, a Velcro strap allows the foot to be secured in the shoe if necessary, or conversely, to be slightly loosened independently of the instep support. Finally, there’s a soft and breathable synthetic upper, with a mesh section for ventilation, and lined inside with a thick padded section. Similarly, the tongue is padded, which allows for powerful tightening with the Boa wire, without any risk of a constricting sensation.

On the sole side, the outsole is made of nylon with a stiffness index of 6, while the high-end S-Works model is at 15. The walking heel pad is not replaceable, but unless you spend more time at the aid station than on the bike, you have plenty of margin before it’s completely worn out. The insole is not as elaborate as specific models, notably lacking arch support, but it already benefits from the metatarsal button, which is a kind of small bump in the middle designed to relieve the metatarsal bones (toe bones). After a few rides, we decided to install blue Body Geometry insoles, with medium arch support, which significantly improved the fit and support of the foot inside the shoes.

Finally, for the heel, there is a real difference compared to more expensive models, as there is no shell or shape designed to pinch the heel here. Instead, this part is certainly a little thicker and a little less flexible than the rest of the upper, but it rather promotes a soft contact with the lower ankle and Achilles tendon.

Specialized also did a great job with the aesthetics of the Torch 1.0, as they adopt a general look similar to the S-Works 7, whether for this model in white or the black one, or even the red ones for those who prefer.

Comfort first

On the first rides, we were initially seduced by the comfort before being bothered by the overall lack of rigidity of the shoes. The closure is not excessively firm and there is always a little freedom at the heel and instep. However, even when applying maximum force to the Boa wire closure, and despite the slight deformation of the synthetic material on the tongue, there is no sensation of blood circulation being cut off. And despite the distance, despite the rain, despite the coolness and despite the heat (they were tested under different conditions), the comfort always remains exceptional.

Of course, as our physical condition improved with the kilometers after resuming cycling, we became more demanding with the Torch 1.0. While remaining seated, even with a large gear and as long as we stay below 400 watts of power output, it’s difficult to notice a real difference in efficiency compared to higher-end models. During our rehabilitation phase with these shoes, we actually went from an average of 26 to 33 km/h, while enjoying their very high-level comfort.

On the other hand, things get worse when riding out of the saddle, on small hills climbed more and more often with bursts of power, and of course during sharp accelerations or sprints. Not only does strong pressure on the pedals allow you to slightly feel the connection with the cleat under the sole, but above all, you feel a lack of lateral support and very average heel guidance. While the efficiency of the Torch 1.0 seems quite comparable to very high-end models up to 350-400 watts, they lose their hold above that and especially during short, violent efforts.

The Torch 1.0 always look good, which doesn’t hurt in the end.

But obviously, it’s impossible to blame Specialized for this entry-level model, intended for more relaxed, occasional use, or for long distances. Because in hindsight, that’s precisely the use for which we would recommend them most, especially as ultra-cycling is gaining momentum. And the Torch 1.0 always look good, which doesn’t hurt in the end.

=> SEE ALSO: All our Gear articles

ADRIS SPEEDLINE 9.